Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10569479
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0181904,
umls-concept:C0205217,
umls-concept:C0439841,
umls-concept:C0441655,
umls-concept:C0443131,
umls-concept:C0596972,
umls-concept:C0728873,
umls-concept:C1261552,
umls-concept:C1521743,
umls-concept:C1547135,
umls-concept:C1547139,
umls-concept:C1561560,
umls-concept:C1561561,
umls-concept:C1704646
|
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1999-11-30
|
pubmed:abstractText |
This study compares the accuracy of a two-dimensional accelerometer worn on the ankle (a step activity monitor) with that of an electronic, digital pedometer worn on the belt line. Twenty-nine human subjects were evaluated while they briskly walked 400 M, slowly walked 10 M, and ascended and descended a flight of stairs. The step activity monitor had less error in all activities; its mean absolute error was 0.54%, whereas that of the pedometer was 2.82%. The difference was more pronounced in obese subjects (body mass index greater than 30), with an overall mean absolute error of 0.48% for the step activity monitor and 6.12% for the pedometer (nearly 13 times that of the step activity monitor). For subjects with a body mass index less than 30, the step activity monitor had an overall error of 0.56% and the pedometer had an overall error of 1.56% (less than 3 times that of the step activity monitor). The absolute error of the pedometer was positively correlated with body mass index (r = 0.792, p < 0.0001) and weight (r = 0.753, p < 0.0001), whereas the error of the step activity monitor was not significantly correlated with either. Neither device was significantly biased by age, gender, or the presence of a lower-extremity joint prosthesis. The accuracy and additional capabilities, including a real-time memory record of activity, of the step activity monitor make it well suited for objectively quantifying ambulatory activity, especially for obese subjects.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
0736-0266
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
17
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
703-8
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Acceleration,
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Ankle Joint,
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Artificial Limbs,
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Body Mass Index,
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Exercise Therapy,
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Linear Models,
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Sports Equipment,
pubmed-meshheading:10569479-Walking
|
pubmed:year |
1999
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Step activity monitor: increased accuracy in quantifying ambulatory activity.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Joint Replacement Institute, Orthopaedic Hospital, Los Angeles, California 90007, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|