Linked Life Data

10522546

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10522546

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-11-15
pubmed:abstractText
Wounds made by the Endopath nonbladed obturator, the Step trocar, and conventional pyramidal tip trocars were compared. The endopath nonbladed obturator and the Step trocar made wounds by separating tissue fibers, whereas the pyramidal tip trocar cut tissue fibers. The wounds of the Endopath nonbladed obturator and the Step trocar were similar in length but were narrower than wounds made by the pyramidal tip trocar. Further studies are needed to determine whether the wounds made by the Endopath nonbladed obturator and the Step trocar will have fewer complications than conventional pyramidal tip trocars.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
1092-6429
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
9
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
455-61
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of wounds created by non-bladed trocars and pyramidal tip trocars in the pig.
pubmed:affiliation
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio 45242, USA. mschweit@hsc.vcu.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study