Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-12-1
pubmed:abstractText
It is a routine procedure for anesthesiologists to use local anesthesia (LA) before spinal needle insertion (SNI), but LA itself produces pain on injection. We evaluated the necessity of LA before spinal block using a 25-gauge needle by questioning whether LA makes SNI painless and easy. Sixty patients without lumbar abnormality for spinal block were allocated to 3 groups: Group A, LA with 2 ml of 1% lidocaine using a 24-gauge needle; Group B, LA with 0.5 ml of 1% lidocaine using a 27-gauge needle; Group C, without LA. Visual analog pain scales of LA and SNI were obtained respectively. Though LA reduced the pain associated with SNI, total pain scales in Group A and Group B were significantly larger than those in Group C. The pain scale of LA was significantly lower in Group B than Group A, but there were no significant differences in the pain on SNI between the Groups. The times needed for SNI were not significantly different among the three Groups. In conclusion, LA with 2 ml of 1% lidocaine using a 24-gauge needle is not useful for pain relief on spinal block using a 25-gauge needle. Intradermal anesthesia using a 27-gauge needle is preferable to reduce the pain on SNI, if LA is necessary.
pubmed:language
jpn
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0021-4892
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
48
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1033-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
[Is local anesthesia necessary for spinal needle insertion?].
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Anesthesia, Asahikawa City Hospital.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, English Abstract, Controlled Clinical Trial