Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10499354rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10499354lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1523873lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10499354lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037643lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10499354lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0080093lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10499354lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10499354lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1152805lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10499354lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242896lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10499354lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1314939lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:dateCreated1999-12-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:abstractTextOrganophosphate poisoning is associated with adverse effects on the central nervous system such as seizure/convulsive activity and long term changes in neuronal networks. This study reports on investigations designed to assess the consequences of soman exposure on excitatory amino acids receptors in the rat brain. In addition, the protective effects of caramiphen which acts at these receptors, and scopolamine, which does not, was determined on soman-induced alteration in rat brain functions. Administration of soman (1xLD50) to pyridostigmine pretreated rats produced seizure activity (measured by EEG monitoring) in all animals tested. Estimation of [3H]MK-801 binding to brain membranes from intoxicated rats revealed a marked decrease in Bmax value 24 but not 2 hrs following soman administration. The specific nature of these effects of soman was demonstrated by the findings that [3H]flunitrazepam binding to central benzodiazepine receptors remained unchanged in soman-poisoned rat brain membranes. Both scopolamine and caramiphen, when used prophylactically prevented the lethal effect of soman and completely blocked the development of electrographic seizure activity (EGSA). In contrast, only caramiphen abolished soman-induced modifications in NMDA/ion channel characteristics. Caramiphen displaced [3H]MK-801 bound to the NMDA/ion channel complex, possibly by interacting with the Zn2+ site whereas scopolamine did not. Moreover, caramiphen, but not scopolamine, partially protected mice from NMDA-induced lethality. Thus, it is suggested that an important component of the protective efficacy of caramiphen against organophosphate poisoning might be attributed to its ability to modulate NMDA receptors in addition to its anticholinergic properties.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:monthAuglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:issn0161-813Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CohenGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WeissmanB ABAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChapmanSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AlkalayDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RavehLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GilatEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RabinovitzIIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:volume20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:pagination551-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:dateRevised2011-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10499354...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:articleTitleThe involvement of the NMDA receptor complex in the protective effect of anticholinergic drugs against soman poisoning.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Pharmacology, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona. lili@iibr.gov.illld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10499354pubmed:publicationTypeIn Vitrolld:pubmed