rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1999-10-4
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The relative value of prone versus supine positioning and axial versus nonaxial beam arrangements in the treatment of prostate cancer remains controversial. Two critical issues in comparing techniques are: 1) dose to critical normal tissues, and 2) prostate stabilization.
|
pubmed:grant |
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
0360-3016
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
1
|
pubmed:volume |
45
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
407-13
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-14
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:10487564-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:10487564-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:10487564-Movement,
pubmed-meshheading:10487564-Prone Position,
pubmed-meshheading:10487564-Prostate,
pubmed-meshheading:10487564-Prostatic Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:10487564-Radiotherapy, Conformal,
pubmed-meshheading:10487564-Radiotherapy Dosage,
pubmed-meshheading:10487564-Rectum,
pubmed-meshheading:10487564-Seminal Vesicles,
pubmed-meshheading:10487564-Supine Position,
pubmed-meshheading:10487564-Urinary Bladder
|
pubmed:year |
1999
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The effect of patient position and treatment technique in conformal treatment of prostate cancer.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
|