Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:10484591rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026336lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10484591lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242692lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10484591lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205147lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10484591lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10484591lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10484591lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1510486lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:dateCreated1999-10-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:abstractTextAlthough there is growing interest in studying muscle distribution, regional skeletal muscle (SM) mass measurement methods remain limited. The aim of the present study was to develop a new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) model for estimating regional adipose tissue-free skeletal muscle mass (AT-free SM). Relationships were derived from Reference Man data between tissue-system- level components (i.e., AT-free SM, AT, skeleton, and skin) and molecular-level components including fat-free soft tissue, fat, and bone mineral. The proposed DEXA-SM model was evaluated by multiscan computerized axial tomography (CT). Twenty-seven male subjects [age, 36 +/- 12 (SD) yr; body mass, 73.2 +/- 12.4 kg; 20 were healthy, and 7 had acquired immunodeficiency syndrome] completed DEXA and CT studies. Identical landmarks for DEXA and CT measurements were selected in three regions, including calves, thighs, and forearms. There was a strong correlation for AT-free SM estimates between the new DEXA and CT methods (e.g., sum of three regions, r = 0.86, P < 0.001). Regional AT-free SM measured in the 27 subjects by DEXA and CT, respectively, were 3.44 +/- 0.60 and 3. 47 +/- 0.55 kg (difference 0.9%, P > 0.05) for calves, 10.49 +/- 1. 77 and 10.05 +/- 1.79 kg (difference 4.4%, P < 0.05) for thighs, 1. 36 +/- 0.49 and 1.20 +/- 0.41 kg (difference 13.3%, P < 0.01) for forearms, and 15.29 +/- 2.33 and 14.72 +/- 2.33 kg (difference 3.9%, P < 0.05) for the sum all three regions. Although the suggested DEXA-SM model needs minor refinements, this is a promising in vivo approach for measurement of regional SM, because DEXA is widely available, relatively inexpensive, and radiation exposure is low.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:issn8750-7587lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WantDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HeymsfieldS...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WangZZlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KotlerDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShihRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FaithM SMSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:volume87lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:pagination1163-71lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:10484591...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:year1999lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:articleTitleRegional skeletal muscle measurement: evaluation of new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry model.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:affiliationObesity Research Center, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10025, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:10484591pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10484591lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:10484591lld:pubmed