rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
8
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1999-8-26
|
pubmed:abstractText |
To evaluate the validity of three criteria-based methods of quality assessment: unit weighted explicit process-of-care criteria; differentially weighted explicit process-of-care criteria; and structured implicit process-of-care criteria.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Aug
|
pubmed:issn |
0025-7079
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
37
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
798-808
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:10448722-Case-Control Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:10448722-Diabetes Mellitus,
pubmed-meshheading:10448722-Heart Failure,
pubmed-meshheading:10448722-Hospitals, Veterans,
pubmed-meshheading:10448722-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:10448722-Lung Diseases, Obstructive,
pubmed-meshheading:10448722-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:10448722-Observer Variation,
pubmed-meshheading:10448722-Patient Readmission,
pubmed-meshheading:10448722-Process Assessment (Health Care),
pubmed-meshheading:10448722-Quality Indicators, Health Care,
pubmed-meshheading:10448722-Reproducibility of Results,
pubmed-meshheading:10448722-Statistics, Nonparametric,
pubmed-meshheading:10448722-United States
|
pubmed:year |
1999
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
An empirical assessment of the validity of explicit and implicit process-of-care criteria for quality assessment.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Center for Quality of Care and Utilization Studies, Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Field Program, Houston, TX 77030, USA. cashton@bcm.tmc.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
|