Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10401652
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1999-9-21
|
pubmed:abstractText |
This study included 527 patients (178 female and 349 male) with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and interference screw fixation. The follow-up examination was performed by independent observers at a median of 38 (21-68) months after the index operation. At the follow-up, the Lysholm score was 86 (14-100) points, the Lysholm instability subscore was 22 (0-25) points and the Lysholm pain subscore was 19 (0-25) points. The Tegner activity level was 6 (1-10). The one-leg-hop test was 91 (0-167)% of the non-injured knee. The difference in the anterior side-to-side laxity as measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer at 89 Newton (N) was 1.5 (-5-13) mm and the total KT-1000 side-to-side difference at 89 N was 2 (-7-11) mm. Using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation system, 177 (33.6%) patients were classified as normal (group A), 211 (40%) as nearly normal (group B), 109 (20.7%) as abnormal (group C) and 30 (5.7%) as severely abnormal (group D). The highest correlation coefficients were recorded between the IKDC evaluation system and the Lysholm score (p = 0.66), the patients' subjective evaluation (p = 0.53), the Tegner activity level (p = 0.34), all the laxity tests (p > or = 0.34) and the one-leg-hop test (p = 0.28). The resumption of sporting activities and work as evaluated by the Tegner activity level correlated with the patients' subjective evaluation (p = 0.34) but did not correlate with the laxity tests, i.e., the manual Lachman test (p = -0.06) and the total and anterior KT-1000 tests (p = -0.06). Furthermore, none of the laxity tests correlated with the functional tests or the patients' subjective evaluation. We conclude that the IKDC evaluation system is a reliable and useful tool for evaluating the post-operative outcome after an ACL reconstruction.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0942-2056
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
7
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
160-5
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Anterior Cruciate Ligament,
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Arthroscopy,
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Athletic Injuries,
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Endoscopy,
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Follow-Up Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Joint Instability,
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Knee Injuries,
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Statistics, Nonparametric,
pubmed-meshheading:10401652-Treatment Outcome
|
pubmed:year |
1999
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A follow-up of 527 patients.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Orthopaedics, Northern Alvsborg/Uddevalla County Hospital, Trollhättan, Sweden. ninni.sernert@nu.alvsborg.se
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|