Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
7
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-8-10
pubmed:abstractText
Most studies have found that the only advantage to the laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer is a reduced need for postoperative analgesia. Therefore, we set out to assess the short-term outcome of open (OR) versus laparoscopic (LR) repair of perforated peptic ulcer.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
0930-2794
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
13
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
679-82
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
Open vs laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.
pubmed:affiliation
Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery and National Center for Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery, University Hospital of Trondheim, Olav Kyrres Gate 17, Trondheim 7006, Norway.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study