Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-6-29
pubmed:abstractText
Six commercial tests (Albicans ID, bioMérieux, France; CandiSelect, Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, France; CHROMagar Candida, Becton Dickinson, USA; Fluoroplate Candida, Merck, Germany; Fongiscreen 4H, Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur; and Murex Candida albicans, Murex Diagnostics, USA) and the germ-tube test for presumptive identification of Candida albicans were evaluated using clinical isolates of Candida albicans (n = 350) and of non-albicans yeasts (n = 135). Sensitivities and specificities of all tests regarding the identification of Candida albicans were greater than 97%. The two tests that also allow presumptive identification of some non-albicans yeasts (CHROMagar Candida and Fongiscreen 4H) did not identify all isolates of Candida glabrata and Candida tropicalis. In addition, CHROMagar Candida identified as Candida glabrata some isolates belonging to different species of non-albicans yeasts.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0934-9723
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
18
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
188-91
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
Evaluation of six commercial tests and the germ-tube test for presumptive identification of Candida albicans.
pubmed:affiliation
University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study