pubmed-article:10337292 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0597198 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:10337292 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205210 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:10337292 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0182981 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:issue | 1 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1999-5-25 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:abstractText | This study was a 2-year clinical evaluation of a conventional and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Thirty-four restorations each of Ketac-Fil and Photac-Fil were placed without tooth preparation in cervical abrasion/abfraction lesions, primarily in premolar teeth. Patients ranged in age from 30 to 73 years, with a median age of 45 years. Isolation for the restorations was accomplished with cotton rolls. Restorations of both materials were retained at the rate of 93%, and both were comparable in appearance, receiving Alfa ratings for more than 85% of the restorations. One occurrence of secondary caries was observed for each material. No significant difference between the materials was observed for any evaluation category (exact binomial test, P > 0.05). | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:citationSubset | D | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:issn | 0361-7734 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BrackettW WWW | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GilpatrickR... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BrowningW DWD | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GregoryP NPN | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:volume | 24 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:pagination | 9-13 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2009-11-19 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10337292... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10337292... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10337292... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10337292... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10337292... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10337292... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10337292... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10337292... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10337292... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10337292... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10337292... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10337292... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10337292... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:10337292... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:articleTitle | Two-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:affiliation | University of Tennessee-Memphis, College of Dentistry, Department of General Dentistry 38163, USA. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:publicationType | Clinical Trial | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:publicationType | Randomized Controlled Trial | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:10337292 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | lld:pubmed |