Linked Life Data

103370

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/103370

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1979-2-23
pubmed:abstractText
The dose distribution obtained with two different techniques for external irradiation of cervical carcinoma is described. The dose to the central area is somewhat higher with the multiple beam technique compared with the newly introduced shielding block technique. The difference between the calculated CRE values for the two techniques is small. When the shielding block is not placed over the area corresponding to the position of the applicators from the previous intracavitary treatment the considerable difference in absorbed dose between the two techniques does not correspond to the difference in the calculated CRE values. A comparison of the relative distributions laterally, in total dose and CRE, shows that for central volumes the relative CRE is much higher than the relative dose, when the normalization is made at the pelvic wall.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0348-5196
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
17
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
440-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1978
pubmed:articleTitle
Dose distribution in 42 MV roentgen irradiation of cervical carcinoma.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study