Linked Life Data

10301284

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10301284

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
1987-3-26
pubmed:abstractText
Two computerized retrieval systems--the National Library of Medicine (NLM) data bases (MEDLINE, TOXLINE, and their respective backfiles) and PaperChase (PC), a subset of the NLM data base, were compared. Comparative parameters of retrieval and costs for literature searching performed on each system were evaluated. Objective measures were used in the evaluation, as well as a subjective assessment of user satisfaction with each system. Data indicate that NLM is a faster and more direct search procedure for a trained individual, making it a more favorable choice in a drug information center. PC is a valuable tool for sites requiring or offering on-line access to many different people searching infrequently. Because P & T Committees must have access to comprehensive and timely literature, knowledge of various retrieval systems is beneficial.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
H
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0098-6909
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
22
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
189-94
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1987
pubmed:articleTitle
On-line literature searching: comparison of PaperChase and National Library of Medicine data bases.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study