Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-6-10
pubmed:abstractText
A matched-pair retrospective analysis was used to compare 70 patients who had undergone peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) with 70 who had undergone autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) for Hodgkin's disease. All transplants took place at a single centre using the same conditioning regimen (BEAM). Patients were matched for sex, previous chemotherapy and relapse status: factors which have previously been shown to have prognostic significance for transplant outcome in Hodgkin's disease at this centre. The two groups were also generally comparable for unmatched patient and disease characteristics. Toxic deaths and 90 d outcome were not different between the two groups. Three-year overall survival was 68.6% for the ABMT group and 78.2% for the PBSCT group (P = 0.078); progression-free survival was 59.4% for the ABMT group and 58.1% for the PBSCT group (P = 0.255), and relapse rates were 36.9% and 42.6% respectively (P = 0.30). Within the limitations of retrospective analysis, we conclude that there is no major overall or progression-free survival advantage for PBSCT compared to ABMT in Hodgkin's disease.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0007-1048
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
105
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
280-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
Peripheral blood stem cell versus autologous bone marrow transplantation for Hodgkin's disease: equivalent survival outcome in a single-centre matched-pair analysis.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't