Linked Life Data

10218026

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10218026

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-4-28
pubmed:abstractText
Different dental materials and methods can influence the integrity of the marginal seal of restorations. To evaluate the microleakage of Dyract AP Light Cured Compomer, a polyacid modified resin (Caulk), using etched and unetched techniques, standardized trapezoidal Class V restorations were placed on facial or lingual surfaces of 20 human molars with the gingival margin in the cementum. Each restoration was scored at the cervical by two independent, double blinded operators, with reference to the DEJ, for dye penetration on a ranking system of: 0 = no evidence of dye penetration; 1 = dye penetration up to one-half the distance to the axial wall; 2 = dye penetration beyond one-half the distance to the axial wall but short of the axial wall; 3 = dye penetration to the axial wall or beyond. Statistical analysis (Fisher Exact Test) indicated that the etched compomer demonstrated significantly less microleakage when compared to the unetched compomer (p < 0.05).
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0363-6771
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
46
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
604-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Dyract compomer: comparison of total etch vs. no etch technique.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study