Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1996-12-3
pubmed:abstractText
No standard assessment for the patient with a shoulder arthroplasty has been universally accepted to date. Traditional assessment tools can be divided into three levels of resolution including: (1) assessments of the quality of life and general health, (2) global shoulder assessments, and (3) assessments for a particular disorder of the shoulder. In this article, examples of each of these groups are discussed. Each of these levels of sensitivity offers a different perspective on the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty and until the ideal, universal outcome measure is developed, outcomes should be reported using assessments in each of these levels.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
T
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
1045-4527
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
6
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
245-64
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1995
pubmed:articleTitle
Measuring outcomes in shoulder arthroplasty.
pubmed:affiliation
University of Michigan Shoulder Group, Ann Arbor, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article