Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10122485
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1993-1-13
|
pubmed:abstractText |
This paper reports the findings of a retrospective survey which assessed the accuracy of the selective screening programme for hepatitis B infection. The survey was undertaken in the antenatal clinics of West Lambeth Health Authority during 1988 and 1990. Forty per cent of hepatitis B positive patients were not screened, which highlights the problems associated with selective screening programmes. The implications for obstetricians and midwives are discussed, and recommendations are made.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
H
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0017-9132
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
24
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
13-5
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:10122485-Ethnic Groups,
pubmed-meshheading:10122485-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:10122485-Great Britain,
pubmed-meshheading:10122485-Hepatitis B,
pubmed-meshheading:10122485-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:10122485-Mass Screening,
pubmed-meshheading:10122485-Pregnancy,
pubmed-meshheading:10122485-Prenatal Care
|
pubmed:year |
1992
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Screening of pregnant women for evidence of current hepatitis B infection: selective or universal?
|
pubmed:affiliation |
St Thomas' Hospital, London.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|