Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1992-9-16
pubmed:keyword
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
E
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
0038-9765
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
44
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1095-131
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Bone Marrow Transplantation, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Clinical Trials as Topic, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Consensus, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Contracts, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Diffusion of Innovation, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Federal Government, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Government Regulation, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Health Care Rationing, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Insurance, Health, Reimbursement, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Judicial Role, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Medicaid, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Medicare, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Research, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Risk Assessment, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Technology Assessment, Biomedical, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Therapeutic Human Experimentation, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-Uncertainty, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-United States, pubmed-meshheading:10119850-United States Food and Drug Administration
pubmed:year
1992
pubmed:articleTitle
Reimbursing new technologies: why are the courts judging experimental medicine?
pubmed:affiliation
Stanford Law School.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article