Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1990-9-20
pubmed:abstractText
One of the distinguishing characteristics of national health care systems is the degree of public involvement in service provision, funding and policy making. In international comparisons the Nordic countries are usually seen as a uniform group. Yet, the countries do have important differences, and a descriptive model was sought to demonstrate these, and, at the same time, to differentiate the concept of public control. Using the central-local dichotomy, differences within the public framework were demonstrated between the countries, e.g. in methods of funding, financial regulation, formal planning instruments, and control of resource allocation. Financial control and planning were identified as two distinct components of public control. An analysis of the degree of centralisation along both dimensions separated the Nordic countries, which are otherwise homogenous as to public sector dominance.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
H
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0749-6753
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
5
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
27-39
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Central and local control in Nordic health care: the public organisation spectrum revised.
pubmed:affiliation
Nordic School of Public Health, Gothenburg, Sweden.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study