Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9156
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-4-14
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:keyword
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0140-6736
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
13
pubmed:volume
353
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
857-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:otherAbstract
PIP: Three outpatient therapies--cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)--are used in the US for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). There has been considerable controversy, however, about the relative safety, efficacy, and costs of these methods. A rigorous study (Mitchell et al.) in which patients were stratified by key prognostic variables provided irrefutable evidence of the similarity of efficacy of the three methods. This suggests that only cost and concern over the small risk of missing adenocarcinoma-in-situ or microinvasive cancer need influence decisions about CIN treatment. Women with lesions affecting more than two-thirds of the surface of the cervix are more than 19 times more likely to have persistent disease than women with smaller lesions, regardless of therapy type. The amount of tissue removed by laser, cryotherapy, and LEEP is small, so these techniques have no adverse affect on pregnancy. The issue of whether low-grade lesions should be treated, even though most are self-limiting, continues to be debated.
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
Management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
pubmed:affiliation
Health Services, University of California, Santa Barbara 93106, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Review