Linked Life Data

10091797

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10091797

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-4-7
pubmed:abstractText
Confidence in a negative stereotaxic breast biopsy result allows for safe clinical and mammographic follow-up, whereas a positive or equivocal diagnosis leads to excision. Direct comparison of stereotaxic core needle biopsy (SCBX) and fine-needle aspiration (SFNA) is needed, and should be based on the use of appropriate current methods of practice, and address the indication of each for different types of mammographic lesions.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0008-543X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
1
pubmed:volume
85
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1119-32
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Pathology and Kaplan Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York University Medical Center, New York 10016, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study