rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1999-3-29
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Surgery is considered the standard treatment for operable esophageal carcinoma, although there is no compelling evidence that surgery can achieve better results than radiotherapy. There has previously been no direct randomized comparison of these two modalities with survival or disease specific outcome end points.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Feb
|
pubmed:issn |
0008-543X
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
15
|
pubmed:volume |
85
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
763-8
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:10091752-Carcinoma, Squamous Cell,
pubmed-meshheading:10091752-Deglutition,
pubmed-meshheading:10091752-Esophageal Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:10091752-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:10091752-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:10091752-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:10091752-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:10091752-Proportional Hazards Models,
pubmed-meshheading:10091752-Regression Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:10091752-Survival Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:10091752-Treatment Outcome
|
pubmed:year |
1999
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The quality of swallowing for patients with operable esophageal carcinoma: a randomized trial comparing surgery with radiotherapy.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|