Linked Life Data

10090457

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/10090457

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-5-27
pubmed:abstractText
The Harvard Alumni study is reviewed critically with a view to resolving the apparent conflict between the conclusions drawn from this research and the current consensus on optimal patterns of physical activity for health. The optimal energy expenditure reported for the Harvard data set is less than at first appears, since the estimated expenditures are gross rather than net values. Further, the optimal energy expenditure has been over-estimated, because too high a cost was assumed for stair climbing, and sport involvement may also have been over-reported. The data do not as yet allow the assertion that benefit is obtained only from vigorous physical activity, and there seems little conflict with the current consensus on the benefits of moderate physical activity.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0172-4622
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
20
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
23-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
How much physical activity is needed for good health?
pubmed:affiliation
Faculty of Physical Education and Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Canada. royjshep@mountain-inter.net
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article