Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-4-14
pubmed:abstractText
The 'Bill on Medical Scientific Research with Humans' fail to state clearly which research may and which research may not be carried out without previous approval from a review committee. This is a problem especially with regard to studies using human body material and studies involving questioning people to collect study data. For the sake of clarity in practice it would be advisable if researchers and review committees would observe the following rules: every planned research project which involves patients or other persons having to do or to undergo something for the special purpose of the study must be submitted by the researchers to a review committee. However, actual reviewing is only necessary in the case of studies which, in the review committee's opinion, entail a real health risk or cause significant physical inconvenience or mental stress. Research involving persons who are vulnerable with respect to self-determination, such as the mentally incompetent, should always be reviewed, even if it does not seriously threaten the subjects' physical or mental well-being.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
dut
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jan
pubmed:issn
0028-2162
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
2
pubmed:volume
143
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
45-50
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
[Medical scientific research with people: what the law does not regulate].
pubmed:affiliation
Academisch Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, English Abstract