Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
1999-5-4
pubmed:abstractText
A previous study highlighted the superior shock absorption of silicone rubbers compared to other elastomers. We evaluated and compared the in vitro biocompatibility of silicone-based rubbers and propose them as an alternative to conventional products. We used the MTT colorimetric test to assess cell viability and flow cytometry to evaluate cell proliferation. Tests were conducted at 24 and 72 h. Changes in cell morphology were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Positive (polyurethane) and negative (polystyrene) toxicity controls were included. The number of viable cells was significantly higher on polystyrene than on polyurethane. A decrease in the total number of cells from 24 to 72 h compared to the negative control was correlated with a lower percentage of S-phase cells. The differences in cell viability noted between the samples and the polystyrene control mainly resulted from an initial lack of adhesion, which was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy. The biocompatibility of the three silicone rubbers was comparable to the best of the three products currently being used. These results, combined with those of the previous study, indicate that silicone rubber could be considered for the manufacture of mouth guards.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0142-9612
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
20
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
291-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1999
pubmed:articleTitle
Evaluation of the in vitro biocompatibility of various elastomers.
pubmed:affiliation
Equipe de Biologie Buccale, UPRES-EA 1256, Université de Rennes I, France. dominique.chauvel@univ-rennes 1.fr
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't