Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:966055rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522564lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:966055lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1512628lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:issue10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:dateCreated1976-11-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:abstractTextThallium-201, 129Cs, 43K, and 81Rb were evaluated as "static" myocardial-imaging agents. Optimal settings of the scintillation camera were determined for each agent. Accumulation for good-quality images can be started as early as 5 min after the dose with 43K, 10 min with 201T1, and 30 min with 129Cs. Imaging times were comparable for 43K, 129Cs, and 201T1 (using the 80-keV x-rays). High-energy photons from the 81Rb preparation, largely from 82mRb contaminant, made it impossible to obtain an interpretable image without the addition of more shielding. Absorbed radiation dose from 81Rb is lower than that from 43K, 129Cs, and 201T1. The highest background activity was observed with 81Rb, followed by 43K, 129Cs, and 201T1 in that order. Overall, 201T1 was best suited for imaging acute myocardial infarction with currently available equipment, and 129Cs was next best. However, because of instrument setting and commercially obtained preparations, 81Rb could not be properly compared with the other radionuclides in our study.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:issn0161-5505lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NishiyamaHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AdolphR JRJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GabelMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SaengerE LELlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LewisJ TJTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SoddV JVJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:volume17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:pagination880-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:966055-A...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:966055-T...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:966055-D...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:966055-R...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:966055-R...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:966055-P...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:966055-M...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:966055-C...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:year1976lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:articleTitleIntercomparison of myocardial imaging agents: 201Ti, 129Cs, 43K, and 81Rb.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:966055pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:966055lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:966055lld:pubmed