Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9445281rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032285lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9445281lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9445281lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1535502lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9445281lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011900lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:dateCreated1998-2-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:abstractTextThe repeatability of the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was assessed prospectively in 44 mechanically ventilated patients with suspected nosocomial pneumonia. Two BAL were performed in the same lung area (contiguous segment) during two fibroscopic procedures performed with a thirty minute interval. All the bronchoscopies were performed by the same operator. The statistical analysis looked out for bias (MacNemar test), agreement, and repeatability (kappa test). In the 44 patients studied, the qualitative repeatability (i.e., presence or absence of bacteria) was excellent (95.4%). However, in the 16 patients having at least one positive culture, these results were more controversial. The quantitative repeatability for bacteria (same log10 for both BAL of the same patient) was the lowest of all the results (26.7%). The distinction between presence and absence of bacterial pneumonia (based on the 10[4] cfu/ml threshold) showed a repeatability of 75% with no bias, an agreement of 47% and a just-significant kappa test (test = 1.97; p = 1.96 for a 5% risk error). BAL seems to have excellent repeatability when sterile. Its repeatability when positive needs further studies to be assessed.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:issn1073-449Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SaintyJ MJMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JeanPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MolenatFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BoussugesAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GerbeauxPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LedorayVVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:volume157lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:pagination76-80lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9445281-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:year1998lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:articleTitleDiagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients: repeatability of the bronchoalveolar lavage.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:affiliationService de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Salvator, CHRU Marseille, France.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9445281pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9445281lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9445281lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9445281lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9445281lld:pubmed