Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8981683rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008976lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8981683lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0920317lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8981683lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205101lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8981683lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0808080lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8981683lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705922lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:issue24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:dateCreated1997-3-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:abstractTextThere exists a variety of situations in which a random effects meta-analysis might be undertaken using a small number of clinical trials. A problem associated with small meta-analyses is estimating the heterogeneity between trials. To overcome this problem, information from other related studies may be incorporated into the meta-analysis. A Bayesian approach to this problem is presented using data from previous meta-analyses in the same therapeutic area to formulate a prior distribution for the heterogeneity. The treatment difference parameters are given non-informative priors. Further, related trials which compare one or other of the treatments of interest with a common third treatment are included in the model to improve inference on both the heterogeneity and the treatment difference. Two approaches to estimating relative efficacy are considered, namely a general parametric approach and a method explicit to binary data. The methodology is illustrated using data from 26 clinical trials which investigate the prevention of cirrhosis using beta-blockers and sclerotherapy. Both sources of external information lead to more precise posterior distributions for all parameters, in particular that representing heterogeneity.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:issn0277-6715lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WhiteheadAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HigginsJ PJPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:day30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:volume15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:pagination2733-49lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8981683-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8981683-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8981683-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8981683-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8981683-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8981683-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8981683-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8981683-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8981683-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8981683-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8981683-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8981683-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8981683-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:articleTitleBorrowing strength from external trials in a meta-analysis.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Applied Statistics, University of Reading, U.K.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8981683pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8981683lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8981683lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8981683lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8981683lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8981683lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8981683lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8981683lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8981683lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8981683lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8981683lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8981683lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8981683lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8981683lld:pubmed