pubmed-article:8943751 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0700287 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:8943751 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205064 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:8943751 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0678005 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:8943751 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:8943751 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1708250 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:8943751 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0021713 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:8943751 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0677862 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:issue | 10 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1996-12-17 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:abstractText | To assess interobserver variation in reporting cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens and to determine whether a modified Bethesda grading system results in better interobserver agreement than the traditional cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grading system. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:citationSubset | AIM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:month | Oct | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:issn | 0021-9746 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:DateAA | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BharuchaHH | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:WalshM YMY | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:HamiltonP WPW | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ThorntonC MCM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:CaughleyL MLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:McCluggageW... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:volume | 49 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:pagination | 833-5 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2009-11-18 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8943751-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8943751-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8943751-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8943751-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8943751-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8943751-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8943751-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:year | 1996 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:articleTitle | Interobserver variation in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens: comparison of grading systems. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Pathology, Royal Group of Hospitals Trust, Belfast. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8943751 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:8943751 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:8943751 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:8943751 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:8943751 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:8943751 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:8943751 | lld:pubmed |