Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8925947rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037047lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8925947lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015576lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8925947lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011011lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8925947lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441655lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8925947lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:dateCreated1996-11-13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:abstractTextThis paper uses the 1910 Census Public Use Sample to examine how the presence and activities of key family members shaped the labor force activity, domestic work, and schooling of working-age daughters. There is no evidence that daughters worked to send their brothers to school; parents practiced a more egalitarian distribution of resources than the literature suggests. Having brothers and sisters in school increased a daughter's odds of attending school herself. Similarly, daughters with employed siblings were more likely to be gainfully employed. Nonetheless, parents allocated activities to sons and daughters in ways that reinforced traditional gender roles. Working brothers increase daughters' likelihood of working in the home, while reducing their odds of attending school.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:issn0070-3370lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SasslerSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:volume32lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:pagination557-75lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8925947-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8925947-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8925947-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8925947-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8925947-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8925947-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8925947-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8925947-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8925947-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8925947-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8925947-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8925947-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8925947-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:articleTitleTrade-offs in the family: sibling effects on daughters' activities in 1910.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Population Dynamics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8925947pubmed:publicationTypeHistorical Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8925947lld:pubmed