Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8456112rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034721lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8456112lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034693lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8456112lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0596981lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8456112lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0003483lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8456112lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332197lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8456112lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439799lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:dateCreated1993-4-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:abstractTextIn cultured rat aortic myocytes, no high-conductance Ca(2+)-and voltage-dependent K+ channels (maxi-K+ channels) such as those found in the human and rabbit were observed. However, we have found that in freshly dissociated rat aortic myocytes, the activities of high-conductance Ca(2+)-and voltage-dependent channels were present and predominant. In cell-attached patches measured with pipettes filled with normal saline solution, their single channel conductances were 139.6 +/- 2.5 picosiemens (mean +/- SE). Under the 140-mM symmetrical K+ condition (both bath and pipette solutions contained 140 mM KCl), that measurement became 207.2 +/- 3.6 picosiemens and increased by about 50% with detaching of the membrane patch. The relative conductances of the channel to K+, NH4+, and Rb+ were 1:0.61:0.48. The conductance of these channels can readily be reduced by more than 90% by extracellularly applied 0.5 mM tetraethylammonium chloride. These characteristics show that they were maxi-K+ channels.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:issn0037-9727lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FanS FSFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KaoC YCYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:volume202lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:pagination465-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8456112-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:articleTitleOn the apparent absence of maxi-K+ channel in rat aortic myocyte.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York, Stony Brook 11794.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:publicationTypeIn Vitrolld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8456112pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed