Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8454549rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1095831lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8454549lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0004755lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8454549lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007452lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8454549lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0204695lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8454549lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1709694lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8454549lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522609lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8454549lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1554112lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:dateCreated1993-4-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:abstractTextNinety-six crossbred steers were used in a 172-d feedlot growth performance trial to determine the effects of type processing on the comparative feeding value of barley in a 90% concentrate finishing diet. Treatments were: 1) steam-flaked corn (SFC; density = .31 kg/L); 2) dry-rolled barley (DRB; density = .39 kg/L); 3) steam-rolled barley, coarse roll (SRB-C, density = .39 kg/L); and 4) SRB, thin roll (SRB-T, density = .19 kg/L). The ADG was similar (P > .10) across barley treatments, averaging 1.29 kg/d. Feed intake (P < .05) was lower for SRB than for DRB. Diet NE was greater (P < .05) for SRB than for DRB. Feed intake was lower (P < .05) for SFC than for barley diets. The influence of grain processing on characteristics of digestion was evaluated using four Holstein steers (average BW = 230 kg) with cannulas in the rumen and proximal duodenum. Ruminal and total tract digestibility of OM and starch were lower (P < .05) for DRB than for SRB. Ruminal and total tract digestibility of OM and starch were similar (P > .10) for SRB-C and SRB-T. However, passage of nonammonia N was markedly increased (26.9%, P < .01) with SRB-T compared with SRB-C. This increase in ruminal N efficiency was due partly to reduced ruminal degradation of feed N (23.4%, P < .01) and partly to increased microbial N synthesis (13.3%, P > .10). The comparative feeding value of DRB, SRB-C, and SRB-T in this study was 90, 92, and 96% the value of SFC, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:issn0021-8812lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ZindR GRGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:volume71lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:pagination3-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:dateRevised2008-11-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8454549-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8454549-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8454549-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8454549-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8454549-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8454549-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8454549-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8454549-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8454549-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8454549-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8454549-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8454549-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8454549-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:articleTitleInfluence of processing on the comparative feeding value of barley for feedlot cattle.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, El Centro 92243.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8454549pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed