Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8314425rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8314425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0029921lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8314425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0033137lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8314425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0542559lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8314425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0936012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8314425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1555558lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8314425lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1704211lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:issue1 Pt 2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:dateCreated1993-7-29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:abstractTextTo assure health care quality requires a tool for establishing the feedback between parameters of patient management and related standards. To assess the current situation and to evaluate the DIABCARE system as a potential monitoring instrument, a retrospective study was performed in 85 randomly assigned insulin-treated patients (72% type 2) who were regularly attending the diabetes outpatient unit (total of 3,595 patients) in a township of approximately 90,000 inhabitants. 1,195 records of sequential medical visits during the years 1987 and 1990 were analyzed. -Selected results (averages in 1987 vs. 1990): (1) Visits per year 6.9 vs 7.1; (2) intensified insulin treatment in 14 vs. 27% of all patients, they were on 4.0 vs. 4.5 injections per day applying doses of 0.8 vs. 0.6 IU kg-1 d-1; (3) glycaemic control: random blood glucose 6.0 vs. 5.8 mmol/l on conventional and 6.4 vs. 5.7 mmol/l on intensified regimes, HbA1 regular measurements in 2 vs. 21% of the patients; (4) body mass index 26.4 vs. 26.6 (conventional) and 24.7 vs. 25.9 (intensified) kg/(m)2; (5) retinopathy prevalence 30 vs. 29%, in 4 vs. 29% of the patients no information; (6) nephropathy prevalence 7 vs. 11%, in 75 vs. 68% of the patients no information; (7) foot complications prevalence 6 vs. 9%, in 91 vs. 84% of the patients no pathological findings. -The DIABCARE monitor proved appropriate but too laborious. The general level of care showed a tendency towards improvement between the two investigated periods but dit not yet meet the standards which must be attained to attain the St. Vincent Declaration.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:issn0338-1684lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MenzelRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchmidtRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FischerUUlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HeinkePPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SalzsiederEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VogtLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RöpkeHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:volume19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:pagination188-94lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8314425-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:articleTitlePrimary health care of diabetic patients in a specialized outpatient setting: a DIABCARE-based analysis.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:affiliationGerhardt Katsch Institute of Diabetes Research, University of Greifswald, Karlsburg, Germany.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8314425pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed