Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8293716rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021289lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8293716lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0743925lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8293716lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0936012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8293716lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2827666lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8293716lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1637833lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:dateCreated1994-3-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:abstractTextMeasurements of triceps and subscapular skinfold thickness, mid-arm circumference (MAC), head circumference (HC) and crown-heel length were performed by two observers in 30 healthy neonates. Intra-observer standard deviation for all measurements, calculated using one-way analysis of variance, was small and similar for each observer. Inter-observer variability was assessed using limits of agreement. There were small, systematic, differences between observers for measurements of triceps skinfold thickness and crown-heel length, and for calculated ponderal index (PI). When related to respective published reference ranges, the 95% prediction intervals for subscapular (-0.51, 0.68 mm) and triceps (-0.65, 0.29 mm) skinfold thicknesses were less than those for the MAC/HC ratio (-2.1, 1.9) and PI (-0.23, 0.28). The results indicate that skinfold thickness measurements are a more robust measure and, therefore, may be of greater value in the assessment of neonates with suspected fetal growth retardation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:issn0378-3782lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChangT CTClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SpencerJ AJAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RobsonS CSClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:day1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:volume35lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:pagination37-43lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8293716-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8293716-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8293716-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8293716-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8293716-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8293716-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:articleTitleNeonatal morphometric indices of fetal growth: analysis of observer variability.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Medical School, UK.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8293716pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8293716lld:pubmed