Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8288498rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0004611lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8288498lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0004613lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8288498lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0949665lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8288498lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0450442lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8288498lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1697858lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8288498lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441669lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:dateCreated1994-2-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:abstractTextAgar dilution and microbroth dilution methods appear equally acceptable for susceptibility testing of anaerobes against temafloxacin and ciprofloxacin. Most major discrepancies occurred with strains whose MIC was near the breakpoint. These results suggest that method variation will not be a significant factor in the susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria against other fluoroquinolone agents.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:issn0305-7453lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EdmistonC ECElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CondonR ERElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KrepelC JCJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GohrC MCMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:volume32lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:pagination571-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8288498-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8288498-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8288498-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8288498-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8288498-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:articleTitleMicrobroth versus agar dilution for susceptibility testing of fluoroquinolones and other agents against anaerobic bacteria.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8288498pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed