Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7968119rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008149lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7968119lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032965lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7968119lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7968119lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0559522lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7968119lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0002645lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7968119lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0014806lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7968119lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:issue8935lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:dateCreated1994-12-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:abstractTextErythromycin, the standard treatment for chlamydial infection in pregnant women, commonly causes side-effects, which limits its efficacy. In a randomised, double-blind study, we compared amoxycillin with erythromycin in this setting. 210 pregnant women with Chlamydia trachomatis infection were randomly assigned 7 days' treatment with amoxycillin (500 mg three times daily) or erythromycin (500 mg four times daily). Control cultures were obtained 21 days after treatment, during late pregnancy, and from the infant within a week of birth. Treatment was judged a failure if any post-treatment culture was positive or if the patient had to stop therapy because of severe side-effects. 11 women (5.2%) were lost to follow-up. 1 (of 100) amoxycillin-treated women had to stop treatment because of severe side-effects compared with 12 (of 99) erythromycin-treated women (p = 0.002). 1 woman in the amoxycillin group had a positive culture at the third-trimester examination. No positive post-treatment culture was found in the erythromycin group. Severe gastrointestinal side-effects were more common in women who received erythromycin (31 vs 6%, p < 0.001). The overall failure rate was therefore 2% in the amoxycillin group and 12% in the erythromycin group (p = 0.005). These results suggest that amoxycillin is an acceptable alternative to erythromycin for C trachomatis infection in pregnant women.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:issn0140-6736lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BoucherMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ParisGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FortierAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CarrierSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JolyJ RJRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MoutquinJ MJMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AlaryMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChamberlandHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MondonAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PinaultJ JJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:day26lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:volume344lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:authorsCompleteNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:pagination1461-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7968119-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7968119-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7968119-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7968119-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7968119-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7968119-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7968119-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7968119-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7968119-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7968119-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7968119-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7968119-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7968119-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7968119-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:articleTitleRandomised comparison of amoxycillin and erythromycin in treatment of genital chlamydial infection in pregnancy.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:affiliationGroupe de Recherche en Epidémiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7968119pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7968119lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7968119lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7968119lld:pubmed