Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7957021rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705275lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7957021lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705274lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7957021lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015672lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7957021lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018896lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7957021lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0597198lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7957021lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7957021lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0086960lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7957021lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0282426lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7957021lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705273lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7957021lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2827501lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7957021lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1554217lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:issue10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:dateCreated1994-12-28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:abstractTextThe directory assistance operators' task with a visual display terminal was simulated to determine the preferable work-rest schedule from among the three different work-rest schedules: 30 min of work followed by 5 min break (30-5); 60 min of work followed by 10 min break (60-10); and 120 min of work without any break (120-0). The total working duration was 2 h. The errors made during the work and the subjective responses before and after the working period (2 h) were recorded and analysed. The results showed that the first two work-rest schedules were preferable to the third condition (120-0) as significantly fewer errors were made (p > or = 0.01) when a short break was provided. There was no significant difference (p > or = 0.10) in errors between (30-5) and (60-10) schemes. Fewer before and after subjective responses differed significantly for (30-5) and (60-10) schemes than for the (120-0) scheme. The overall effect of schemes on subjective responses, however, was not statistically significant at the 5% level. Since both (30-5) and (60-10) schemes were found acceptable, the (60-10) scheme is recommended since it is easy to implement, causes fewer breaks and therefore, fewer work interruptions, and leads to fewer total minutes of break.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:issn0014-0139lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MitalAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KopardekarPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:volume37lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:pagination1697-707lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7957021-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7957021-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7957021-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7957021-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7957021-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7957021-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7957021-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7957021-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7957021-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:articleTitleThe effect of different work-rest schedules on fatigue and performance of a simulated directory assistance operator's task.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:affiliationErgonomics and Engineering Controls Research Laboratory, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221-0016.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7957021pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed