Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7821011rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0337611lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7821011lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0020517lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7821011lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038750lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:dateCreated1995-2-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:abstractTextIn the last 2 years, 2,894 consecutive eczematous patients were patch tested with sodium metabisulfite 1% pet. Positive reactions were elicited in 50 subjects (1.7%). All 50 patients were also positive to potassium metabisulfite 1% pet. and sodium bisulfite 1% and 5% pet., while only 2 of them were positive to sodium sulfite 1% pet. Prick tests and intradermal tests with a sodium metabisulfite solution (10 mg/ml) were negative. No flare-ups of dermatitis or patch test were provoked by oral challenge with 30 mg and 50 mg of sodium metabisulfite. The dermatitis was taken to be occupational in 7 cases. In only 5 out of 43 non-occupational cases was the positive reaction considered relevant.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:issn0105-1873lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AngeliniGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VenaG AGAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FotiCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:volume31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:pagination172-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7821011-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7821011-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7821011-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7821011-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7821011-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7821011-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7821011-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7821011-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7821011-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7821011-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:articleTitleSulfite contact allergy.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Dermatology, University of Bari, Italy.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7821011pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed