Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7808206rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0012634lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7808206lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242216lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7808206lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1274040lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7808206lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0376409lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7808206lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7808206lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1442989lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7808206lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0681889lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:dateCreated1995-1-31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:abstractTextTo estimate patient preferences for gallstone-related treatments and outcomes, and assess how preferences vary by patient characteristics and scaling technique, the authors randomly assigned 40 patients without gallstones to interviews based on a rating scale (n = 22) and a standard gamble (n = 18). The patients assigned preference values (possible values 0 to 1) to open cholecystectomy (mean 0.45 by rating scale, 0.78 by standard gamble), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (0.71, 0.91), extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (0.77, 0.89), acute cholecystitis (0.36, 0.77), lifetime biliary colic (0.41, 0.71), postcholecystectomy syndrome (0.43, 0.79), asymptomatic stone necessitating treatment with bile acids (0.76, 0.96), and surgical scar (0.79, 0.998). Preferences varied little by age, gender, or race. Standard gamble values were highly correlated with, but significantly greater than, rating scale values. The authors conclude that patients' preferences for gallstone-related conditions generally are significantly less than one, and differ markedly by the scaling technique used to derive them. These results should be considered when patient preferences are incorporated into analyses of gallstone treatments.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:issn0272-989Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JohnsCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SabaG PGPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PittH AHAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LillemoeK DKDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GriffithsR...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SteinbergE...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BassE BEBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:volume14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:pagination307-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7808206-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:articleTitleComparison of the rating scale and the standard gamble in measuring patient preferences for outcomes of gallstone disease.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7808206pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7808206lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7808206lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7808206lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7808206lld:pubmed