Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7673051rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0331509lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7673051lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0597198lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7673051lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018270lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7673051lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332282lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:dateCreated1995-10-19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:abstractTextA growing-finishing study using Angus steer calves was conducted in three phases: 1) grazing stockpiled 'Kentucky-31' tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) with high (65%; HE KY-31) and low (0%; LE KY-31) infestation rates of Acremonium coenophialum Morgan-Jones and Gams and 'Kenhy' and 'Johnstone' tall fescue with low (< 1%) infestation rate of Acremonium coenophialum from October 24 to December 19; 2) drylot feeding of Johnstone and HE KY-31 haylage (December 19 to April 10); and 3) feedlot finishing on a common high-concentrate diet (April 11 to August 1). In Phase 1, ADG was greatest (P < .05) for Kenhy, intermediate for Johnstone and LE KY-31, and lowest (P < .05) for HE KY-31. Implantation with estradiol 17-beta increased ADG (P < .01) by 23, 27, 7, and 2% for steers grazing Johnstone, HE KY-31, LE KY-31, and Kenhy, respectively. Dry matter digestibility and DMI of stockpiled Johnstone and HE KY-31 were not different (P > .10). During Phase 2, steers consuming Johnstone haylage had greater (P < .01) DMI, ADG, and gain:feed ratio (G:F) than steers consuming HE KY-31 haylage. During Phase 3, steers previously consuming Johnstone had greater DMI (P < .10); however, steers previously fed HE KY-31 had greater ADG (P < .05) and G:F (P < .01). By the end of the study, steer body weights were not different (P > .10) between treatments. These data indicate that growth-decreasing effects of endophyte-infested fescue were evident at hypothermal-ambient temperatures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:issn0021-8812lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FordM JMJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BradleyN WNWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HowardM DMDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MuntiferingR...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ForbesT DTDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BeconiM GMGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:volume73lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:pagination1576-84lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7673051-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7673051-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7673051-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7673051-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7673051-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7673051-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7673051-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7673051-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7673051-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7673051-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7673051-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7673051-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7673051-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:articleTitleGrowth and subsequent feedlot performance of estradiol-implanted vs nonimplanted steers grazing fall-accumulated endophyte-infested or low-endophyte tall fescue.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546-0215, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7673051pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed