Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7604632rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0230206lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7604632lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0404077lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7604632lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1963551lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7604632lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521802lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:issue1-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:dateCreated1995-8-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:abstractTextThe effect of visceral peritoneal closure after conventional abdominal hysterectomies and Wertheim-Meigs radical operations was studied clinically. No considerable differences were found in the postoperative staying period; however, the incidence of complications were less in the peritoneal non-closure group (n = 91) than in the control, peritonealized group (n = 149). Significantly lower was the number of postoperative irregular pyelogram in cases without peritoneal closure (n = 25) of radical abdominal operations than in the control group (n = 49) with peritoneal suturing. We therefore suggest that the lack of suturing of visceral peritoneums has some advantages after abdominal hysterectomies and especially has benefits for Wertheim-Meigs operations.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:issn0231-4614lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:authorpubmed-author:UTEIN INIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KrommerK FKFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AranyA AAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchunkEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VizerMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:volume34lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:pagination79-86lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7604632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7604632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7604632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7604632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7604632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7604632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7604632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7604632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7604632-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:year1994lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:articleTitleClosure or non-closure of visceral peritoneums after abdominal hysterectomies and Wertheim-Meigs radical abdominal hysterectomies.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical University, Pécs, Hungary.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7604632pubmed:publicationTypeControlled Clinical Triallld:pubmed