Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7556256rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031809lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7556256lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037303lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7556256lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021968lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7556256lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036043lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7556256lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009924lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7556256lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0296806lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:dateCreated1995-11-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:abstractTextIn a single-centre comparative randomised double-blind trial, 40 patients undergoing head CT were examined using iobitridol and compared with 40 examined using iohexol. The contrast media were assessed for clinical safety and diagnostic efficacy. No significant difference was observed between the two groups and there were no significant reactions. It is concluded that iobitridol is a safe and effective contrast medium.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:issn0720-048Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TaylorWWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MoseleyIIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:volume20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:pagination57-60lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7556256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7556256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7556256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7556256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7556256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7556256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7556256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7556256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7556256-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:articleTitleAssessment of the safety and efficacy of iobitridol, an iodinated contrast medium (30% iodine), in cranial CT.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:affiliationLysholm Department of Radiology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7556256pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Trial, Phase IIIlld:pubmed