Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7484924rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032659lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7484924lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031809lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7484924lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0006777lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7484924lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1442959lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7484924lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018684lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7484924lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439810lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7484924lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038951lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7484924lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015737lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:issue5 Suppllld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:dateCreated1995-12-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:abstractTextThe third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) was conducted to assess the health and nutritional status of the US population. As part of the nutritional status assessment, reliable 24-h dietary recalls were collected for 14,801 examined persons. Mean (+/- SEM) energy intakes are reported for persons aged > or = 2 mo by age, sex, and race-ethnicity. Males had higher mean energy intakes than did females. Energy intakes peaked during late adolescence and young adulthood and declined thereafter. Energy intake patterns were similar among non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Mexican Americans. Underreporting was addressed by computing a ratio of energy intake (EI) to estimated basal metabolic rate (BMRest). This ratio (EI:BMRest) was 1.47 for adult males and 1.26 for nonpregnant adult females. Overweight adults had a lower mean EI:BMRest (1.09 in females and 1.28 in males). Underreporting in food consumption surveys remains problematic among females and overweight persons.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:issn0002-9165lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JohnsonC LCLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CarrollM DMDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BriefelR RRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McDowellM AMAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CaughmanC RCRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AlaimoKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BischofA LALlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:volume62lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:pagination1072S-1080Slld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7484924-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:articleTitleTotal energy intake of the US population: the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1991.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:affiliationDivision of Health Examination Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7484924pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7484924lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7484924lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7484924lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7484924lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:7484924lld:pubmed