Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7349534rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0006104lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7349534lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034963lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7349534lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1317574lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7349534lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7349534lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439611lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7349534lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0323819lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7349534lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0998638lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7349534lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0597910lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:dateCreated1983-3-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:abstractTextAfter the antennae of Lithobius forficatus were amputated, electrical stimulation of the deutocerebral apex (= antennal lobes) either in the spring or the autumn led to (1) a decrease in the number of regenerated articles, and (2) an increase in the time-lag between the experiment and moulting. Moreover, in the spring experiments, the antennae regenerated asymmetrically. The electrostimulatory effect could act through an endocrine centre, probably the cerebral glands.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:issn0181-1916lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JolyRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DescampsMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:volume21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:pagination377-82lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:dateRevised2003-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7349534-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7349534-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7349534-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7349534-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7349534-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7349534-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:year1981lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:articleTitleEffect of brain electrostimulation on antennal regeneration in Lithobius forficatus L. (Myriapoda:Chilopoda). Preliminary note.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7349534pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed