Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:7126937rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205245lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7126937lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205160lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7126937lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1446409lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7126937lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332514lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:issuePt 3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:dateCreated1982-12-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:abstractTextSubjects were divided into high and low negative self-statement and high and low positive-self-statement groups on the basis of the assertiveness self-statement test (Schwartz & Gottman, 1976). High negative self-statement subjects reported more anxiety during assertion role plays than did low negative self-statement subjects and were rated by judges as exhibiting more non-verbal anxiety and performing less assertively than low negative self-statement subjects. Judges rated high positive self-statement subjects as more irritable and brusque than low positive self-statement subjects. Theoretical implications are discussed.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:issn0144-6657lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SafranJ DJDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:volume21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:pagination223-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7126937-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7126937-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7126937-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7126937-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7126937-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7126937-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7126937-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7126937-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7126937-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7126937-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7126937-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:7126937-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:year1982lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:articleTitleThe functional asymmetry of negative and positive self-statements.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:7126937pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed