Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:6694674rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018104lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6694674lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026336lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6694674lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441472lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6694674lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015004lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6694674lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1314939lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:issue10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:dateCreated1984-3-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:abstractTextWhen Congress in 1978 created the President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, the federal government claimed unprecedented power over ethical issues in medical practice. The commission's term has recently expired, and proposals for a successor body are being considered. The question is whether the government should be making pronouncements on medical ethics and if so, how. This article argues for a government role of limited scope and evaluates the mechanism Congress chose, the independent advisory commission, against others recently proposed. We conclude that the alternatives will not fulfill a proper government role and that the temporary independent advisory commission is the most appropriate model.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:issn0028-4793lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WolfS MSMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AbramM BMBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:day8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:volume310lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:pagination627-32lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:dateRevised2000-12-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6694674-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6694674-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6694674-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6694674-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6694674-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6694674-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:year1984lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:articleTitlePublic involvement in medical ethics. A model for government action.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6694674pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:6694674lld:pubmed