Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:6496651rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522230lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6496651lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0557854lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6496651lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0027978lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:issue8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:dateCreated1984-11-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:abstractTextA random sample of 2000 persons throughout New Zealand was questioned on the use of and attitudes toward vision care. One-half of the respondents had had a vision examination within the past 4 years. Of those that had been examined, 72% were seen by an optometrist and 22% were seen by an ophthalmologist. Fifty-two percent of the sample wore spectacles or contact lenses, and in the 25 to 34 year age group 12.5% wore contact lenses. The majority (66%) reported no visual problems, and of this group 42% would visit a medical practitioner, 41% an optometrist, and 11% an ophthalmologist if they were to develop a visual problem. At the last visual examination 28% were advised that they did not need a refractive correction, 22% were told their present aid was adequate, and 46% were prescribed new spectacles.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:monthAuglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:issn0093-7002lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GarnerL FLFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FacerW AWAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MadiganCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:volume61lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:pagination543-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6496651-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:year1984lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:articleTitleOphthalmic services in New Zealand.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6496651pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed