Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:6394739rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6394739lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0012632lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6394739lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1999177lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6394739lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6394739lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439165lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6394739lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439836lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:dateCreated1985-2-28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:abstractTextIn clinical research, test data are often encountered where groups differ in terms of total number of responses. When this occurs, conversion of component scores into percentages of R for each individual is recommended before multivariate clustering techniques are applied. An illustration of increased prediction resulting from percentage conversions is presented and other advantages of this approach are discussed.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:issn0022-3891lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WagnerE EEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AlexanderR...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ProsperoM KMKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:volume48lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:pagination617-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6394739-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6394739-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6394739-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6394739-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6394739-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6394739-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6394739-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6394739-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:6394739-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:year1984lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:articleTitlePercentage conversions as a method of enhancing clinical discriminations.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:6394739pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed