Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:534669rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015382lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:534669lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1704675lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:534669lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449864lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:534669lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1511790lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:534669lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:534669lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1842981lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:dateCreated1980-5-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:abstractTextDetection thresholds for electrocutaneous stimulation were measured in young male subjects by two different methods - a method of limits and a forced-choice method - the latter assumed to be less influenced by decision processes. Relations between the threshold measures and scores in the EPI extraversion (E) and neuroticism (N) scales were studied. High N-low E ("unstable introvert") subjects had the lowest thresholds. The result is in line with the predictions made on the basis of Eysenck's personality theory.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:issn0301-0511lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchallingDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RisslerAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EdmanGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:volume9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:pagination41-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:534669-H...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:534669-N...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:534669-T...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:534669-M...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:534669-A...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:534669-P...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:534669-E...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:534669-E...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:534669-D...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:year1979lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:articleTitleInteraction effects of extraversion and neuroticism on detection thresholds.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:534669pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed