Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:511650rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037817lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:511650lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0184661lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:511650lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449864lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:511650lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:511650lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0520510lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:dateCreated1980-2-28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:abstractTextAscending and descending procedures were used to obtain speech reception thresholds from 32 normal-hearing subjects whereas digits and spondee words were used as test materials. Comparisons of thresholds were made for the two procedures and materials. Results indicated that slightly lower (less SPL) speech thresholds resulted from the use of a descending procedure with both types of material. In addition, digit material was found to yield generally lower threshold values than spondees. Advantages to the use of the two procedures and materials are discussed.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:issn0164-5080lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RobinsonD ODOlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KoenigsM JMJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:volume4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:pagination227-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:511650-H...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:511650-A...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:511650-A...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:511650-S...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:511650-S...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:articleTitleA comparison of procedures and materials for speech reception thresholds.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:511650pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed